Inspirational, lifestyle, News, and everything in the middle
Marouane Fellaini trusted by Jose Mourinho but Manchester United must move on
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
No player divides opinion quite like Marouane Fellaini at Manchester United.
To
many, he is a symbol of the club's decline in the post-Sir Alex
Ferguson era -- a player who embodies United's limitations and one who
would not even be considered for Old Trafford had the Scot still be in
charge.
For others, however, he is an example of perseverance,
dedication, character and, certainly from Jose Mourinho's perspective, a
player who offers unique qualities that give United a crucial Plan B
when the chips are down.
Fellaini's stoppage time winner against Arsenal on Sunday was an
example of Plan B being executed to perfection -- a long ball, won by
the towering Belgian, which found its way into the net off the back of
Fellaini's head.
It wasn't pretty, but it was effective -- a summation which could pretty well describe Fellaini's career.
His
winner against Arsenal brought Fellaini's Old Trafford future back into
sharp focus, however, with the 30-year-old out of contract at the end
of the season.
Roma, Marseille and wealthy clubs in the Chinese
Super League are keen to sign the £27.5m buy from Everton as a free
agent this summer, but Mourinho also wants him to stay at United.
Fellaini
has so far rejected the terms on offer remain at the club, but Mourinho
remains hopeful the midfielder will commit to a further two years at
Old Trafford.
But the question over what Fellaini does next quickly comes back to the debate over what he actually brings to United.
Perhaps
both sides of the debate are right. Fellaini does embody where United
are right now, but he is also an effective option for Mourinho to turn
to when required.
Having endured a nightmare start to his United
career under David Moyes, when he became the target of frustration from
the supporters, who cruelly nicknamed him the "Lampshade" because of his
appearance and lack of movement, Fellaini has fought back to carve out a
good career at the club and earn respect on and off the pitch.
He has secured winners' medals in the FA Cup, EFL Cup and Europa
League and made more appearances for United than the likes of Dwight
Yorke, Teddy Sheringham, Dimitar Berbatov and Robin van Persie.
When he goes, he may not be remembered fondly by everyone, but he will leave having made his mark.
But in the cold light of day, for United to become what they want to be again, Fellaini has to be consigned to the past.
Plan
B worked on Sunday against Arsenal, when Fellaini was preferred as a
substitute to the more creative Juan Mata, but the reality is that it
doesn't work that often.
Fellaini can be a game-changer, but he can also get United stuck in the mud, especially against top-quality opposition.
This
season, he has scored just four Premier League goals, but there have
been no assists, despite his aerial prowess and ability to knock the
ball down for his teammates.
According to official Premier League
statistics, Fellaini has not even created a goalscoring chance this
season. He has delivered just three crosses, with a 0 percent accuracy
rate, and has produced no through balls.
How about the defensive
side of Fellaini's game? Well, again using Premier League data, he has
made 15 tackles, with a 53 per cent success rate.
He has won four
50-50 battles and, when it comes to aerial duels he has won 33 and lost
21, so he is perhaps not the unique game-changer that Mourinho believes
him to be.
Arsenal aside, his goals this season have come against
Crystal Palace, Basel and Leicester City -- last season was a similar
tale of strikes against lesser lights Middlesbrough, Wigan and Hull,
with one crucial effort coming against Celta Vigo.
If Fellaini is a
game-changer, he does not change too many of the big ones, which is why
Mourinho and United should now accept that the time has come for a
parting of the ways.
Fellaini has made a valuable contribution at
United, but while he remains at the club, will they truly be a
challenger for the major honours?
As it stands, his presence gives Mourinho the easy option to go long and resist a more creative approach.
Clubs who win
the biggest prizes rely on skill, craft and flair to break down stubborn
opponents, rather than a player like Fellaini, because creating gaps in
the final third is a much more reliable way to score than launching the
ball on to a big midfielder's head and hoping for the best.
Manchester
City, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern Munich and Liverpool all back
pace, flair and creativity over long ball football and they are the
teams winning, or fighting it out for, the biggest trophies.
United, with Fellaini in the team, could not even overcome a limited Sevilla in the Champions League round of 16.
Without
Fellaini, Mourinho would have to find another way, a better way, to
unlock opponents' doors, but does he want to do that?
Or is he happier to fall back on Plan B, regardless of its unconvincing success rate?
But for United to progress and become a serious contender again, they need to learn how to live without Fellaini.
Although it isn’t currently available, the forthcoming coronavirus vaccine could potentially land you in jail or face a hefty fine if you refuse to take it. Dating back to a law initially enacted in 1905, the United States has the full authority to place anyone in jail or fine them for refusing the vaccine. ABC10News reports, during a recent interview Dov Fox, a law professor and the Director of the Center for Health Law Policy and Bioethics at the University of San Diego, explained just how much power the U.S. has in regard to forcing citizens to take a vaccine or accept the consequences. “States can compel vaccinations in more or less intrusive ways. They can limit access to schools or services or jobs if people don’t get vaccinated. They could force them to pay a fine or even lock them up in jail.” The legal precedent dates all the way back to 1905. Citing the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Jacobson v. Massachusetts—in which the court ruled Massachusetts had the authority to fine...
On iOS , this one’s easy. If you delete a photo (or all of your photos ever), they’re not gone for good the moment you tap the trash can icon. Scroll down through your albums in Photos. The very last one you should see—in the main “Albums” listing, not the secondary “My Albums” listing—is an album called Recently Deleted. You can’t miss it. Its icon is boring, gray, and trash-can-shaped. Tap that, and you’ll be able to restore anything you accidentally deleted. Your iPhone will keep deleted photos around for just around a month or so. the dates listed on the photos are countdowns. Once they reach zero, the photos are automatically exiled from your device forever. The same is true for any photos you delete on iCloud. They aren’t gone forever—at least, not initially. Just go restore them from the Recently Deleted folder. Ta-da. Android users have a similar deal. First off, there’s no reason why you shouldn’t be automatically backing up all of your photos to Google Photo...
A bribery settlement and the fall in the pound have pushed engineering giant Rolls-Royce to a record loss. The jet engine maker reported a loss before tax of £4.6bn for 2016. However, once one-off costs have been stripped out, the company's underlying profit was better than many experts had predicted. Rolls-Royce agreed to pay £671m to settle corruption cases with UK and US authorities and it has written off £4.4bn from currency related contracts. Underlying profits fell to £813m, down from £1.4bn the previous year, although the fall was much less than many analysts had forecast. Rolls-Royce Holdings Rolls-Royce, which has been a completely separate company to the car-maker since 1971, said the outlook for this year was for a "modest performance improvement", while chief executive Warren East said more needed to be done to improve profit margins. Mr East took over as chief executive in 2015 with the task of turning round the struggling company. It i...
Comments
Post a Comment